INTAC_Internet_Access_Web_Hosting Linux for Windows Users MozillaQuest MQ Logo
MozillaQuest the on-line computer magazine
July 27, 2003

EPIX Internet Services
MozillaQuest Magazine Front Page button

Internet & Web browsers button

custom Netscape & Mozilla themes & skins button

Digital Photography


IRC - Internet Relay Chat - Chat button

Linux buttonLinux for Windows Users

Mozilla button


Netscape button
network articles

tutorial - help - how to button

Web Page Design

Web Tools

Windows button

Is IBM's Irrevocable Unix License Revocable?

Does SCO's Amended Complaint Meet Burden for Summary Judgment?

SCO-Caldera v IBM Complaint Changed Dramatically

By Mike Angelo -- 27 July 2003 (C) -- Page 3

MozillaQuest Op-Ed

Article Index

SCO-Caldera v. IBM:

SCO Clears Linux Kernel but Implicates Red Hat and SuSE

IBM Files Answer to SCO's Caldera v IBM Complaint

IBM Response to SCO-Caldera Complaint Is Outrageous!

SCO Has Not Found Its Code in Kernell.Org Linux Kernel or in GNU/Linux OS -- Conectiva, Mandrake, and SuSE Say No SCO in Their Code

Kernel.Org and GNU/Linux Developers Have Clean Code Safeguards -- Is SCO Trying to Dictate Linux Kernel and GNU/Linux Development Procedures?

Novell Says SCO Does Not Own Unix IP -- SCO Says it Does -- Novel Enters the SCO IP Fray with No Proof and More FUD

IS SCO NDA Sideshow Setting a Trap for Analysts and Linux Developers?

SCO +1, Novell -1 in SCO v Novell Unix-IP Feud -- Novell loses big round in Unix IP fray with SCO-Caldera

SCO-Caldera & the GNU/Linux Community:

Unix IP Note

Interestingly, it seems that SCO-Caldera does not own any Unix patents nor does it own the Unix trademark or Unix specification. Moreover, SCO might not own the relevant Unix/AIX Copyrights either.

Novell's announcement that SCO did not obtain the Unix copyrights when it purchased Novell's Unix business made the entire SCO IP fracas very interesting.

Of course the 1996 amendment to the 1995 Asset Purchase Agreement adds lots of FUD to that prior Novell announcement.

In March, Allen Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Open Group, told us that The Open Group got the Unix trademark and the Unix specification.

Don Marti, Linux Journal editor, did an interesting patent search in March. He found Caldera has never had a patent assigned to it . . . So, if SCO is interested in throwing the first stone in a licensing war, all they have to play with is copyright on UNIX source code. (Follow the Patents, People, Linux Journal News Notes 6 March 2003) Please also see Microsoft licenses a SCO patent? What patent?, also by Don Marti. Links in Resources section at the end of this article.)

The heavy duty SCO threat killers though, are (1) the statements made to MozillaQuest Magazine on Tuesday by IBM's Trink Guarino that IBM owns the copyrights to the IBM-developed AIX, JFS, RCU, NUMA software and so forth code that IBM contributed to the Linux kernel plus (2) the statements made to MozillaQuest Magazine on Thursday by SCO's Blake Stowell agreeing that IBM and not SCO owns those copyrights.

SCO just might not have any rocks at all to throw.

SCO Says IBM's Irrevocable License is Revocable

Or, the outcome of the case might turn on as yet overlooked documents that already have been made public. For example, here is an excerpt of an e-mail discussion between MozillaQuest Magazine and SCO's Blake Stowell that took place in early May 2003.

Blake Stowell: As for the question about the license being irrevocable, in Exhibit D, Amendment X, (you will find this on our IBM lawsuit Web site), it specifically says:

"Upon payment to SCO of the consideration in the section entitled" Consideration", IBM will have the irrevocable, fully paid-up, perpetual right to exercise all of its rights under the Related Agreements beginning January 1, 1996 at no additional royalty fee. However, if IBM requests delivery of additional copies of source code of the Software Product, IBM will pay the fees listed under Section 1 (b) of Soft-00015 Supplement No.170. Notwithstanding the above, the irrevocable nature of the above rights will in no way be construed to limit Novell's or SCO's rights to enjoin or otherwise prohibit IBM from violating any and all of Novell's or SCO's rights under this Amendment No. X, the Related Agreements, or under general patent, copyright, or trademark law."

MozillaQuest Magazine: SCO has not alleged any general patent, copyright, or trademark law violations in its Caldera v IBM Complaint. Moreover, afaik, SCO does not have any patents of the Unix code nor does it own the Unix trademark. Additionally, Linus Torvalds owns the Linux trademark.

MozillaQuest Magazine: My reading of this is that it does not demean the irrevocable nature of the contract. It only gives SCO a right to enjoin/prohibit violations of the agreement. It does not even give SCO a contractual right to seek damages for contract violations.

Blake Stowell: In other words, the license to IBM is perpetual and irrevocable, so long as IBM honors the contract that they have signed with SCO. If they violate the terms of their contract, then the contract is no longer perpetual and irrevocable.

MozillaQuest Magazine: Please see above.

Blake Stowell: Wouldn't you agree?

MozillaQuest Magazine: No, Please see above.

MozillaQuest Magazine: IMHO, if you want to claim that IBM has violated the agreement, you have to state specifically, clearly, and with particularity how IBM has violated the agreement. Then you have to show the exact language in the contract that says the contract may be revoked for such violations.

Blake Stowell never did show us any documented rhetoric that specifically allows SCO-Caldera to terminate IBM's perpetual, irrevocable license, which is set forth in Amendment X.

Interestingly, however, SCO to some degree did what we suggested then in that discussion in its later Amended Complaint. There, SCO states more specifically, more clearly, and with more particularity how IBM has violated the Unix license agreements. (Perhaps we should send SCO's lawyer, David Boies, a bill for the law lesson.)

We found some language that does seem to allow SCO to terminate IBM's Unix license in a part of the said Exhibit "D". It is in the Reference Source Code Agreement, which is dated 2-5-98. Amendment X is dated 10-17-96. That language does seem to grant SCO-Caldera the right to terminate IBM's irrevocable Unix License.

Under paragraph 1.02 of the Reference Source Code Agreement SCO may terminate all IBM's Unix license rights.

1.02 If YOU fail to fulfill one or more of YOUR material obligations under this Agreement, SCO may, upon its election and in addition to any other remedies that it may have, at any time terminate all the rights granted by it hereunder.

Does that not give SCO authority to terminate IBM's Unix License and override the perpetual, irrevocable license granted to IBM under Amendment X?

We discussed SCO's Amended Complaint and related issues with Thomas C. Carey, a programmer turned lawyer, via e-mail while this article was in development. He does not believe that paragraph 1.02 of the Reference Source Code Agreement SCO is applicable. Please check our interview with Tom Carey in an (upcoming soon) companion article, Are SCO's Rebuilt IBM Lawsuit and Unix License Revocation Winners -- Or More SCO FUD?.

IP attorney Mark Radcliffe noted:

Irrevocable means you can't terminate, you can only get injunctive relief (stopping breaching the agreement), otherwise irrevocable would have no separate meaning.

Another proviso is that the facts alleged in SCO-Caldera's Amended Complaint are true, correct, and honest. So far, IBM has not put forth any facts in the SCO v IBM lawsuit itself to challenge the facts as set forth in SCO-Caldera's original Complaint or Amended Complaint.

Until such time as IBM does set forth facts in its court filings that challenge the facts as alleged by SCO, the lawsuit presumption lies in favor of SCO's allegation being true and correct. The Amended Complaint clearly has shifted the burden of proof from SCO-Caldera to IBM, for now.

None of this means there is any purloined code in the Linux kernel or the GNU/Linux operating system. To the contrary, the evidence shown to date in SCO's traveling code side-show and circus is that the allegedly purloined code is in the Linux-based system of an IHV (independent hardware vendor) -- and SCO has shown only 80 lines of identical Unix and Linux code in that IHV's Linux-based system.

Also, please keep in mind that this lawsuit is about breach of contract and other torts. It is not about copyright infringement, per se. More about that further on in this article.

On the other hand, IBM could mount an affirmative defense rather than challenge SCO on the facts. For example, IBM might try to mount an affirmative defense that JFS (Journaling File System), NUMA (Non-uniform Memory Access) software, RCU (Read, Copy, and Update), and other such technologies are well-known and therefore, IBM did not violate any confidentiality agreements by helping the Linux kernel developers incorporate those technologies into the Linux kernel.

However, so far IBM has not mounted an affirmative defense. So far, IBM has not mounted any sort of effective defense to the SCO v IBM lawsuit!

IBM listed seven affirmative defenses in its Answer to the original Complaint. But, all IBM did was to make a boiler-plate list of seven affirmative defenses without substance.

Conversely, the statement made by IBM's Trink Guarino Tuesday that IBM owns the copyrights for the work we've done in AIX, JFS, RCU and the code that takes advantage of NUMA hardware indicates that IBM will have a very strong defense to SCO's claims -- when and if it introduces evidence to support that statement in the SCO v IBM lawsuit proceedings.

  • See Derived Works -- JFS, NUMA, RCU, Etc. on Page 4 ----->

  • Please see the first two parts of our series about SCO-Caldera's IP claims plus its intentions to enforce and license its intellectual property rights.

    SCO-Caldera & the GNU/Linux Community: The SCOsource IP Matter

    SCO-Caldera & the GNU/Linux Community: Part 2, Under the Iceberg's Tip

    Related MozillaQuest Articles

    SCO-Caldera v IBM:

    SCO-Caldera & the GNU/Linux Community: The SCOsource IP Matter

    SCO-Caldera & the GNU/Linux Community: Part 2, Under the Iceberg's Tip

    About the "Hey SCO, sue me" Petition

    Caldera OpenLinux 3.1.1 Available

    Caldera OpenLinux Workstation 3.1 -- A First Look

    UnitedLinux, a Divisive Weapon for Caldera's Darl McBride -- Part I

    UnitedLinux, a Divisive Weapon for Caldera's Darl McBride -- Part II

    SCO's Darl McBride and MozillaQuest Magazine's Mike Angelo Discuss Caldera Linux and LSB

    Caldera/SCO 3.1.1 OpenLinux Distribution Gains LSB Certification

    Linux Makes a Great Gift

    Don't Forget the Books

    LinuxWorld in New York City -- 21-24 January 2003

    Other Interesting MozillaQuest Articles

    Copyright 2000-2003 -- MozillaQuest -- Brodheadsville, Pa..USA -- All Rights Reserved
    Recent Articles

    Gaël Duval Tells Why Mandrake Linux Is Better Than MS Windows

    Gaël Duval and Mike Angelo Discuss The HP-Mandrake Computer

    HP to Ship Desktops with Mandrake 9.1 Linux Pre-Installed - Good News for Mandrake Linux and Fans

    Mozilla 1.4 Browser-Suite -- AKA Netscape 7.1

    Gaël Duval and Mike Angelo Discuss Mandrake Business Products and Finances

    SuSE Linux Desktop Available

    About the Hey SCO, sue me Petition

    Mandrake Linux 9.1 Retail Packs

    Linux for Windows Users -- Linux Networking for Windows and Desktop People -- Mandrake 9.1 and LinNeighborhood

    Gaël Duval and Mike Angelo Discuss the New AMD64 OS --

    Mandrake Linux Corporate Server 2.1 for AMD Opteron

    SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 8 for AMD64 Released

    Major Morphing in Mozilla Project Organization and Objectives Proposed

    Red Hat Linux 9 Distribution Released

    Mandrake Linux 9.1 Released

    SCO-Caldera v IBM:

    Mandrake 9.1-RC1

    Netscape 7.02 Browser-Suite

    SCO-Caldera & the GNU/Linux Community: The SCOsource IP Matter

    Mozilla 1.0 updated!

    Don't Forget the Books

    Linux Makes a Great Gift

    Christmas Season Holidays & Computer Suggestions 2002

    Netscape 7.01 Browser-Suite

    Mozilla 1.2.1 Browser-Suite Released

    Buggy Mozilla 1.2 Recalled

    Mandrake Linux 9.0, Desktop Magic You Can Use: A First Look

    Linux for Windows Users:

    Using LinNeighborhood to Create a Network Neighborhood for Linux

    SuSE Linux 8.1

    Zero Tolerance for Privacy and Security Bugs

    Mozilla and Netscape JavaScript Bugs Compromise Privacy and Security

    Red Hat Linux 8.0 Is LSB Certified

    Mandrake 9.0 is LSB Certified

    SCO's Darl McBride and MozillaQuest Magazine's Mike Angelo Discuss Caldera Linux and LSB

    UnitedLinux: A Standard or a Distribution?

    UnitedLinux, a Divisive Weapon for Caldera's Darl McBride -- Part II

    Holger Dyroff, Gaël Duval, Mark de Visser and Mike Angelo Discuss LSB, UnitedLinux, and the Linux Market

    UnitedLinux, a Divisive Weapon for Caldera's Darl McBride -- Part I

    Netscape Communicator 4.8 Browser-Suite

    Red Hat Calls on Linux Comunity for Beta Feedback

    MandrakeSoft Calls on Linux Community for Beta Testers

    Scott McNeil and MozillaQuest Magazine Discuss LSB

    New Mozilla Roadmap Sets 1.1 for 9 August 2002 and Effectively Kills Mozilla 1.0.x

    MandrakeSoft Says Yes to LSB but No to Netscape and UnitedLinux

    Mozilla 1.0 Browser-Suite's E-Mail & News Quick Look

    Mozilla 1.0 Browser Quick Look

    Tabbed-Browsing Coming to KDE's Konqueror Browser

    A Quick Look at Mozilla 1.0 Browser-Suite Performance -- Speed, Stability, and Memory Hogging

    Mozilla 1.0 is Officially Out!

    A Quick Look at Some Mozilla 1.0 Browser-Suite Annoyances, Bugs, And Issues

    Mozilla 1.0 Not Ready for Prime Time -- Close but No Cigar and No Brass Ring!

    Turmoil in MozillaLand:

    Mozilla 1.0 Browser Unofficial Sneak Release

    AbiWord 1.0.1 Quick Look - MS Word Clone for Linux, MS Windows, & Other Platforms

    KDE 3.0 Released

    MozillaQuest Magazine 2001 Editor's Choice Hardware Picks

    Getting Started with Wireless Network Technology

    Part III: Adding Wireless to a Linux-Based Laptop or Notebook

    Is Mozilla Actually AOL-Netscape's Mozilla?

    Bugzilla 2.16 & Bugzilla 2.14.1

    Year 2001 in Review -- Mozilla and Netscape Browsers

    Free Software for Your New Christmas Computer -- Or Any Computer for That Matter

    Linux Gifts for Christmas, Holiday, and All Occasions